Facebook Badge

Navigation Menu

featured Slider

Kartik Tiwari AKA Karthik Aaryan



People feel that actors are public property, and they aren’t wrong: actors make a place in their life by being who they are, and they snuggle in so smoothly that they are but helpless to believe that they are a part of their life even though it were only a figment of their imagination. Alas, this, like everything else real, is really a thing of the past, unless of course we are to talk about some like Kartik Tiwari, who possesses the magic to conquer you wholeheartedly from the present produce of stars, provoking most effortlessly such a response in the masses of having people think him very much part of their lives.

For those still wondering who he is, well he is a lad from Gwalior who arrived in Bombay to pursue his dreams of making it as an actor, and fortunately he did make a place in the hearts of nearly everybody with his splendid portrayal about women that has been arbitrated as the finest, and also the longest monologue in the history of Indian cinema. Then again, this is not a part of reportage meant for news dailies that has been designed to sound in a fashion so as to promote his films, but a slice from the life of both Kartik and us, more akin to a mirror of the real self behind the reel that you know of him.

When I watched his film Pyaar Ka Punchnama – an honest portrayal of life in its truest and yet assorted shades, the character of Rajat stayed with me. The world being as small as it is, I could have obtained his number from my high and mighty friends from the Bombay film industry, but instead of doing that I sent him a note of appreciation and was delighted to hear from him the following day. Without much prod we struck an amiable rapport and found ourselves communicating on a regular basis from then on. More than anything else what we shared was humour, and that’s when I realised how important humour was indeed as a binding and furthering factor in friendship. In time, I wanted to write something on him and whenever I expressed such a desire, he would laugh it away and my mood too would then fizzle, not until my eyes fell upon the image of him holding his dog (whom I gathered had passed away) that I felt was the right time to write on a friend who had made a huge difference in my life simply by being who he was: kind, loving, honest, sensible, intelligent, instinctive and also impulsive at times, but above all someone I knew and trusted blindly.

One would agree, I suppose, that at some stage in life we have felt that we do not know what it is really about people that the moment we glance at them we feel this instant connection. And like I mentioned earlier, this connection seems even stronger for millions of people considering that the person in discussion was in the public eye, the difference being, and I noticed it right at the beginning with this boy, that he had an uncanny ability to reach out to make sure that everyone who wrote to him received a warm and personal note of gratitude establishing this comfortable connection with them at once, which was so very uncommon in today’s stressed and time-pressed society. That is when I began to pay attention to some of his words, as they are the soul of the mind, and relished some of his remarks while he advised the youth to indulge in sports than being glued to social media, or the times when he wished people a safe and sensible Diwali, not forgetting to recommend that they ought to eat healthy and live healthy if they cared for the prosperity and well-being of their near and dear ones. This in accompaniment with much more sparked something off in me and I embarked on a little experiment where I showed people a picture of Kartik and asked them what they thought of him, and the reactions I was met with follow –

Vikram, a self-proclaimed critique of Indian cinema asked, “Is this the guy from that movie Pyaar Ka Punchnama?” When I nodded, his response was, “There’s something naughty behind that smile: like a mischievous side. In the movie he was doing the role of a supressed individual which he is not. I think there is so much competition but he was lucky to get the right break.” Appreciation from a person who normally shredded actors with his wry words was like music to my ears.

The next individual was Swetha, a sparkling and socially secure woman from the crème-de-la-crème of the Bangalore society. She studied his photograph with intent and said, “He is cute.” She then paused, gave it a second look and went on, “It strikes me more than anything that he seems quite friendly and has a warm smile to match. I think he is entirely into fitness and I also think that he loves dogs. A man who loves dogs will never ill treat his woman and such a man is any woman’s dream,” said she, stopped, blinked curiously and asked, “But who is he?” I smiled and changed the topic.

The third person I presented his picture to was Neha, an urbane model, who having finished her chartered accountancy recently, was currently pursuing her law. She loved, particularly among many others in cinema, Matthew McConaughey. Her instant feedback; “He’s likeable. Carefree. Has a thick mop of hair. A perfect smile I must say and a very pleasant face. He also has this almost cherubic innocence that very few possess. If I were to describe him in one word he is love,” she paused and asked, “I hope I am making sense?” I nodded. “By the way who is this good looking young bloke?” she queried. I smiled at her and before I could change the subject she exclaimed, “Oh yes. I’ve seen his film. It was good. He was good. I hope he does well because he has that extra edge that many others don’t, to touch people with who he is as a person than merely an actor on the screen.”

While some of you might question the purpose of such an undertaking, or even think that I have offered nothing novel that cannot be found online on him from his unending list of fans, I would only confess that my intention was merely to observe what people thought of him the moment they looked at him, and if you realised it didn’t matter to anyone really that he had an enigmatic public persona. It didn’t matter too whether the women found him cute, or the guys thought him cool – what mattered ultimately was his personality, what was within him: his heart and his soul, and the fact that he held the capability and capacity to inspire a change in you not by ‘asking you to change’ but by behaving in a manner so as to make you look up to him and make you want to be like him inward, outward, had me succeeded in my endeavour to represent him such in my own eyes.    

The final cherry on the pie was the man himself. When I informed him about what I had been doing, albeit briefly, he thanked me profusely in his customary politeness and then dissolved into a laugh. I made a face and expressed, “I’m serious and you’re laughing, Koki?” He laughed even more and spoke most shyly, “Yea. Yea. I know.” I followed that up with, “Only the insecure get carried away by popularity. The humble bow their head with humility and thank life for giving them what they truly deserve: a trait one rarely sees these days. It is a given that people have become transitory and shallow, and when you chance upon a gem in the rubble, you don’t quite need to point to it, the sheen automatically gets one to take note of it. So people like you, Koki, make people better by who they are, and the least we can do is love and cherish them with all of our hearts.” I stopped and asked him to wipe away the smile from his countenance for which he chuckled and declared instantly, “I ain’t that good though.” I smiled and said, “That’s what all the good ones say!” He laughed from the depth of his heart as I further added, “The proud one’s think they are good and that’s where the downfall begins. So…” He said nothing and didn’t have to say anything as well. I imagined what he was thinking and that was the hallmark of a hero, a real hero – our very own Koki and your very own Kartik.  


Marilyn Monroe By Alfred Eisenstaedt

Marilyn, oh Marilyn
how much I loved you so...
and
that you read a book 
I love you even more!


HER


Not in the face
is her light
but in the heart
her beauty





Image: This image does not belong to me. I have sourced it from the Internet. I do not own it, or claim copyright to it. If it is your image please do let me know if you are fine with me adding your name to it. I shall add credits to it. This is not a site for business. The images have been used for representational purposes only. If you wish, I shall take it off in case of an objection do let me know and I shall take it off. Thank you.

The Good Guy - 2009



First, you can change the style of your clothes, but not the actuality within. You can want to be popular, but there’s no rule to attaining it. The people who get swayed in wanting to please others most often, please none, and end up being alone; the only difference being that in this case, the character of Tommy Fielding played by Scott Porter is a clear case of nature versus nurture and who vanquishes is what you will have to figure when you watch the motion picture.

Second, the laws of attraction follow their own path. No external prod or pressure could add or diminish it when it sets its heart on what it wants. This is what Daniel Seaver (Bryan Greenberg), a formal avionics engineer, the man who is misused for his goodness, and allows people to do so because he knows who he is and doesn’t really need the approval of others for him to etch an image of his own self. I adore the method in which he shows us all a way of life by merely being himself. His character is strong, smart, attractive and infectious. He portrays a perfect gentleman, difference only that he is not in a suit but in tees and jeans. The fact also that he is slightly nervous around women is a bonus because any man, who is genuine, would be. I reckon that many might not identify with him, but guys like him who are slow and steady, are the guys who finally get to where they need to get. Unfortunately, the ones who assume themselves to be smart and gods gift to mankind do not realise that mankind has moved on, and it is ultimately the man with values and some chivalry who gets the woman who is entitled to him.

Third, I don’t understand the inimical American romance with the word ‘fuck’. There are various ways to emphasise on matters of concern than adding that, ‘Fuck!’ - ‘Fucking!’ preceding every other word in every sentence. It spoils even the finest work by the indiscretions of wanting to be, in another American classic word ‘cool’.

Tommy is supposedly made out to be suave, but remotely. Despite his streaks of genuineness, I thought him predictable and stupid. When someone thinks they are indispensible then sadly it is just the beginning of their downfall I suppose.  

Beth Vest (Alexis Bledel) is a sweet, Manhattan bred young woman. Despite her reserved demeanour, she is someone with varied interests. She loves books and has a fine group of unfeigned and sometimes over-enthusiastic friends who meet to discuss everything from politics to Lolita. She loves travelling and treasures the meaningful aspects of life rather than the flake that Tommy’s world so easily consists of. She’s not a stunner in terms of oomph but comfortable to watch nonetheless. The honesty she lends to the character actually adds to the realism merited by the role.  

Sex is the best comforter when in emotional pain, and I was glad Daniel and Beth take their relationship to the next level with charm and rather organically, while at the same time it is deplorable how Tommy uses sex as nothing less than an ego boost. If you ask me, I’d rather turn asexual than bonking women to make a point. It is guys with empty souls who feed their empty inner selves by trying to be convincing make pure jackasses of themselves.  

Cash, the role of the boss played by Andrew McCarthy is something that I disliked. He is cynical and tactless. His usage of the word ‘fuck’ is annoying and his jokes flat. He barely even contributed to the movie and I wonder why he was written in the first place.

Loved the subtleties though, like the woman whom Tommy was two timing with Beth (the one in the red dress), takes off her heart-shaped necklace to denote that their relationship is over and only if you are careful enough, you’ll notice it, else it will escape your eyes.  

In all, I loved the character of Daniel and Bryan has done a splendid job with it. His lines are gems to absorb and reflect, and reminds me much of what Albert Camus once said; that we only know of one duty, and that is to love. That, in a nutshell, is the essence of The Good Guy.

Sex or Peanut Butter?



Sex, or peanut butter? 
Peanut butter obviously. 
Hands down. 
Hands up. 
Or wherever else the hands: peanut butter always wins!
After SEX though ;-) 








Image: This image does not belong to me. I have sourced it from the Internet. I do not own it, or claim copyright to it. If it is your image please do let me know if you are fine with me adding your name to it. I shall add credits to it. This is not a site for business. The images have been used for representational purposes only. If you wish, I shall take it off in case of an objection do let me know and I shall take it off. Thank you.

Andre Kohn - The Woman In Red

When my eyes first set upon this piece of work, I was completely apprehended by its romance. It was as if it were narrating a story, and took a place in my heart for being the most beautiful piece of work I had seen in recent times. What's more, it so very much reminded me of Monet. 

I made an effort to trace the artist and wrote him a note asking for its availability. His response disheartened me; it was sold to someone else. He was kind as ever in offering his services to create one with the similar theme, but it made no sense to me, really, since it was THIS that I felt ridiculously sad having lost. 


Love And Other Drugs - 2010


A simple and swift film about the trials and tribulations of ones inner journey brought about by the external factors that precipitate to help get there. Like French cinema that meddles with your mind, or even the Italian that draws from simple story lines and weaves them into these complex sagas, this piece of American cinema is rather direct and yet with all the nuances that finds the right threads if you know where to look for them. 


On the pessimistic front, I found two things amiss, first the entire pharmaceutical inclusion unnecessary: barely contributed to the storyline. Wonder what the producers and writers were thinking while wanting to include that angle. The exclusion of the time wasted on it could have been used adequately to build the situation between Jake and Ann a bit stronger. The second aspect that could have been dealt with a little more sensitively was of Parkinson’s. It was rather sketchy and unexplored. People who swear by cinema and see the portrayal of the onset of the disorder would be petrified, in a way. The team ought to have taken the preventive measures to present it adequately than making it slightly awkward, or even scary, as they did here.


I don’t really care that majority of the critics have shot the movie down ruthlessly. What’s more, sometimes critics too write garbage. Then again, perhaps the fact that I love Jake and Ann might be the reason I decided to overlook the flaws and concentrate on the strengths. I suggest you do the same as well and have a nice evening watching Love And Other Drugs. Yes, nail them babes with the strongest aphrodisiac, your ‘own mind’ that can keep your member ‘up’ rather then resorting to popping the blue pill for assistance. And that we are on the topic of the blue pill, well, a serious word of caution: do not be mislead by the publicity of the movie that promotes plenty skin. Certainly, there is sex and some delightful sex too, but do not be fooled that this is some slow, browbeating art-house product. It is hundred per cent American at its European best.


Dockers Campaign

Found these modern, yet vintage style ads on a website called Vintage Me Oh My. Typography, being one of the art forms I admire, I seemed to have liked the concepts and the rendering of these, so posting them here for the rest of you to enjoy them as well. 






Nelson Algren



“I do have the feeling that other writers can’t help you with writing. I’ve gone to writers’ conferences and writers’ sessions and writers’ clinics, and the more I see of them, the more I’m sure it’s the wrong direction. It isn’t the place where you learn to write. I’ve always felt strongly that a writer shouldn’t be engaged with other writers, or with people who make books, or even with people who read them. I think the farther away you get from the literary traffic, the closer you are to sources. I mean, a writer doesn’t really live, he observes.”

— Nelson Algren, The Art of Fiction

Søren Udby. Two Portraits




Mere colour, unspoiled by meaning, and unallied with definite form, can speak to the soul in a thousand different ways said Oscar Wilde.

The pictures of the amateur Danish photographer Søren Udby are quite the essence of the above. What’s more, he normally uses only a single light to shoot his portraits, and the results: a definite artistic delight to the human eye.