Facebook Badge

Navigation Menu

featured Slider

Showing posts with label Wife. Show all posts

A CONSCIENCE UNTAMED BY CONVENTION


 

I was in conversation earlier today with a dear friend—one whose husband, incidentally, is my companion at the gymnasium, though geography has conspired to keep us apart more than we would like. I divide my time between London and Bangalore; he between Dubai and Bangalore. Our paths, once more regular, have become transitory.

 

Now, he is a man of formidable resolve—a Christian by faith, and a self-made gentleman who rose to affluence not by inheritance but by sheer vigour of will and mind. She, by contrast, was born into a lineage steeped in the old world’s quiet opulence—Muslim by heritage, and raised amid the grace of generational wealth. Their union, born of youthful affection in the days of school uniforms and forbidden notes, had the makings of poetry—two souls who defied familial resistance and wove a life together across two decades, raising two daughters under what once seemed a canopy of enduring love.

 

But time, that subtle thief of certainties, has other ways. I was dismayed to learn that they have now filed for divorce. The unravelling, I gather, did not arrive as a storm but as a slow disintegration—a dissolution more tectonic than tempestuous. For over ten years, they have inhabited a house where love had long ceased to sing. Now, as often follows when affection dies quietly, what remains is the debris—ashes of intimacy, and the impending tedium of legal partitions: estates, entitlements, and the melancholy arithmetic of endings.

 

Let us be clear—this is not a tale of material pressure. Both are fortified by sufficient wealth to render financial constraint irrelevant. Nor is this a saga of acrimony. She bears no grievance, and he, it seems, simply finds himself dulled by the repetition of her presence. She understands, almost with philosophical resignation, that love, like any human construct, can suffer erosion, and even extinction.

 

What pains her is not the loss of romance but the collateral damage—the children. She never desired motherhood, and expressed so from the start. Yet life, with its inscrutable humour, led them to bring two beautiful souls into the world. And now she fears, rightly so, that if this rupture is not handled with maturity and care, it might leave scars on those young hearts that could outlast even the most generous settlement.

 

This brings me to my own reflections—not born out of bitterness or confusion, nor as some would ignorantly speculate, from damaged affections, or misplaced desires. I am not confused. I am not escapist. I am not broken. I am certainly not homosexual, fluid, or whatever else the world, in its idle amusement, would seek to label me. I am simply someone who values—above all else—my clarity, my peace, and my freedom. I would rather walk alone in the truth of who I am than be bound by the folly of convention or the expectations of others.

 

One must, before entering the covenant of marriage, understand the weight of what one is choosing—not merely for oneself, but for the woman, the children (should there be any), and the wider constellation of lives affected by that union. The world is quick to preach that marriage is a balm for all woes; parents speak of it as if it were salvation, and society parrots the phrase “settle down” as though it were synonymous with moral triumph. But I say: there is no “norm” except the one a man or woman freely chooses for himself or herself.

 

If I am ever to be with a woman, it will be by choice, not compulsion—not because society demands it, nor because family or friends cast disapproving glances. I am answerable to my conscience, and to it alone. I do not live to appease the world; I live to honour the still voice within that knows what peace truly means.

 

And here is a truth I daresay most would rather leave unspoken: ask ten couples if they would part ways with their partners were it not for the gaze of society, and I dare say eight, perhaps nine, would whisper “yes.” We are a generation that stays not out of love, but out of fear—of judgment, of loneliness, of perceived failure.

 

So when I consider all this, I do not feel sorrowful for having refrained from diving headlong into a pool whose depths I had not measured. I know myself too well to believe I have not the time or the inclination to wrestle with the unnecessary wounds of heartbreak, nor the slow torment of rebuilding from a ruin I could have avoided.

 

Madness, you ask? Perhaps, to those who judge from a distance. They may think me odd or difficult to comprehend, and they are entitled to their illusions. But I—within the fortress of my mind—know that I am neither mad nor lost. I am, rather, deliberate. I am precise. I am clear-eyed, and above all, free. And in a world drunk on pretence, that is an uncommon and upright sanity.

 

 


THE FIDELITY OF FADES


 

The morning lay draped in a kind of gilded calm, the sort you only find in Hyde Park at seven o’clock, before the bankers had finished their protein shakes and the tourists had unclenched their guidebooks. The chestnut trees stood like patrician sentinels, polished by dew, while the gravel paths gleamed with the faint glimmer of rain from the night before. Swans in the Serpentine moved with the measured insolence of duchesses.

 

Arthur Cavendish and Benedict Montrose, both twenty-eight, both inheritors to far too much land and far too little purpose, were running side by side in expensive Lycra that gave them the look of overpaid mercenaries. Their trainers made the gravel crackle.

“Dash it, Ben,” Arthur puffed, “did you see that blasted study about men and barbers? Apparently we are more faithful to the chap who trims our hair than the woman who shares our bed.”

Benedict snorted, cheeks flushed, curls damp with sweat. “Faithful? It’s bloody ecclesiastical, you pompous arse. I’ve had Nigel at St. James’s clip my hair since Eton. The man knows the ridges of my skull better than I do. My ex, on the other hand, couldn’t have told you which side of the bed I favoured if you’d tattooed it on my arse. Damnable business.”

Arthur laughed, nearly tripping on a root disguised as virtue. “And yet—here’s the irony, you hopeless cad—Nigel never once texted me with: We need to talk. He simply gets on with the business of shearing me like a prized Southdown. That, my dear fellow, is fidelity without the infernal dramatics.”

They pounded past the Italian Gardens, fountains sparkling like champagne spilled by angels. The air smelled faintly of wet leaves, dog fur, and the sort of artisanal coffee only ever drunk by hedge-fund managers pretending to be poets.

“You know what it is?” Benedict said, spitting onto the grass with blue-blooded derision. “Trust. You let a man hover a pair of scissors by your jugular for seven straight years without cocking it up—that’s intimacy of the highest bloody order. A girlfriend? Oh, she’ll flounce off the moment you forget an anniversary, but Nigel—Nigel never forgets the grade of my fade. God bless the man.”

Arthur wheezed, half with laughter, half with exertion. “So you are saying marriage should model itself on the barber’s chair? Quiet, dependable, once a month, no blasted quarrels?”

“Precisely,” Benedict replied, slowing near a rose garden, “sit you down, warm towel, soothing silence, job well done. None of this incessant prattling about feelings. Christ on toast, it’s the very model of domestic bliss.”

Arthur bent double, laughing, his breath mingling with the perfume of damp roses. “For God’s sake, Ben, you are making me want to propose to Nigel. Imagine the vows: In scissors and in clippers, till death or baldness do us part.

Benedict grinned wickedly. “And you’d damn well mean it. Though Nigel deserves better than you, you simpering goat.”

Arthur swatted him with the back of his hand. “Better than me? Ha! You vain peacock, the poor devil would retire after one fortnight of your incessant prattle about hairlines.”

At which point, as if conjured by their mock-litany, a tall figure emerged from the mist ahead. Clad in a neat navy tracksuit, jogging with the steady rhythm of a man who cuts hair as precisely as he breathes, came none other than Nigel himself. The Nigel. Scissors’ own high priest, prophet of the perfect taper.

Arthur stopped dead. “Bugger me sideways. Speak of the barber and he shall appear.”

Benedict froze too, suddenly as reverent as an altar boy. “Nigel Montmorency—by Jove, it is him. The Michelangelo of the fringe. The Rembrandt of the razor.”

Nigel gave them a polite nod as he approached, sweatless, serene, the sort of man for whom even sprinting appeared an act of immaculate craftsmanship.

“Morning, gentlemen,” he said in his steady baritone, as if announcing the beginning of a haircut.

Arthur blurted, “Nigel, old chap, we were just—er—discussing our undying loyalty to you.”

Nigel raised one eyebrow, with the calm disdain of a man who has endured aristocratic confessions before. “So long as you book your appointments on time, Mr Cavendish, loyalty is assumed.”

Benedict nearly swooned. “You see, Arthur? No drama, no bloody melodrama. Just cold, dependable certainty. The man is a philosopher in clippers.”

Arthur straightened, flushed. “Nigel, if society collapses, if governments fall, if marriages fail—promise me you’ll still be there on Jermyn Street with your scissors.”

Nigel allowed himself the faintest smile, which on any other face would have been rapture. “Hair grows regardless of civilisation, Mr Cavendish. One must always be ready.”

With that, Nigel dashed on, disappearing into the mist like some barbering demigod, leaving the two young men trembling with a kind of comic awe.

Benedict exhaled a shaky laugh. “Christ alive, Arthur, I feel as though we’ve just seen God.”

Arthur wiped his brow. “Not God, you fool. Better. God never got my parting straight.”

The pair jogged on, grinning like schoolboys who had glimpsed eternity through a pair of scissors—until both their pockets began to vibrate. The cheerful ringtone of duty.

Arthur groaned, yanking out his phone. “It’s Amelia. Bloody marvellous.” He thumbed it on. “Darling?”

Amelia’s voice came crisp, imperious. “Arthur, where the devil are you? The decorator’s arrived early, and he’s threatening to paint the drawing room a shade called ‘Tuscan Blush.’ If you’re not back this instant to veto it, I shall drown myself in the Serpentine.”

Arthur winced. “Yes, darling. On my way. Immediately. Don’t touch the bloody blush.”

Meanwhile Benedict had lifted his own phone, rolling his eyes heavenward. “Yes, Charlotte?”

Charlotte’s tone was sharper than cut glass. “Benedict, you left the Pomeranian without breakfast. He’s whimpering like an orphan and I’ve a Pilates class in twenty minutes. Get back now or the poor creature will perish of neglect.”

Benedict mouthed silently to Arthur, for Christ’s sake, before answering meekly, “Of course, my love. I’ll run, sprint, bloody teleport.”

Both men ended their calls in sheepish silence. The park, once filled with swanlike serenity, now felt like a stage on which they had been caught out, two clowns dragged back into the comedy of real life.

Arthur sighed. “So much for eternal fidelity to Nigel.”

Benedict shook his head, already turning towards the nearest exit. “Bugger loyalty, old boy. Domestic tyranny trumps barbers every time.”

Arthur muttered as they broke into a reluctant jog, “Nigel would never have stopped a run for bloody Tuscan Blush.”

“And he’d sooner starve himself than whimper like that damned Pomeranian,” Benedict added darkly.

 

And so they went, heirs to dynasties but prisoners to decorators and dogs, trudging back not to the temple of Nigel but to the altar of modern love—its scissors blunt, its towel stone cold.

 



I THINK




In today’s times, one observes the male species a bit troubled to commit, specifically to marriage. Not that in the past they felt any different, it is just that today we live in rather fluid times, and there are abundant reasons that gravitate towards men not committing. Loneliness, or confusion about one’s sexual preference is certainly not one of them. What else then, you might ask? Cautious and careful are the two watchwords that withhold men from commitment with the opposite sex, and nearly most of their life sciences seem somehow to revolve around those two factors.

Examined most pragmatically, the roles of men and women have been etched rather befittingly from the inception of mankind: men have been the bread earners, and women, the homemakers. One leading factor to have drilled a hole in the happiness was the woman’s liberation movement, followed by the financial independence that women have obtained in the last couple of decades. This has ruined the pattern that had been followed since centuries. Then again, it is not the fault of women alone. They have been repressed from eons, and it was but natural that they sought respect, and respect, they knew, could be earned if they stood on their own feet, and that would happen if they qualified and educated themselves, and that is what they went about doing. However, somewhere, in the pursuit of practising such unparalleled power, most women have found themselves confused – they have no clue whether they belong to an office, or to their homes, and this has lead to dissatisfaction, conflict, and a crack in something that would have been wonderful had this whole ‘I want equality’ not interfered with the equilibrium chartered out from time immemorial.

I read articles every now and then of people theorising about why something is this or that. I also hear discourses on self-help that say if you do this, this will happen, and if you do that, that will happen. Truth is nothing will happen unless you want it to happen, and you cannot make anything happen until it is the time for it to happen. The rest is nothing but a marketing and money laundering drama.

If I were to cite my own example, I would say that I am now a bit old to get married by conventional Indian standards, and it has nothing to do with my sexual preference – I am perfectly and clearly heterosexual, but what had kept me from letting a woman into my comfort zone for a long time could be attributed perhaps to two possible reasons. My father, besides being born into great wealth, inherited a great fortune as well, and did not consider keeping himself occupied with a day job as it was below the dignity of aristocrats to be caught up in the nitty-gritty of life. If that was not enough of a mental adjustment, my mother, from an equally illustrious ancestry, was unable to handle my father’s indifferent nature, and had to give up her medical profession, which she loved, and dress herself up in the role of the proxy man in order to keep the semblance of the family intact, whilst he sailed, rode horses, barbequed at the exotic farmlands he bought in affluent cities and regularly burnt rubber of his luxurious four wheels. This image had established such asymmetry in me as a child that I found it incredibly tough to cope with changed gender roles, and as a consequence I escaped into a world of my own – my mind palace, as I would term it. In my palace I was free of conflict, and this is the crux of male mentality – they loathe conflict. I did not permit the domestic imbalance distress me and with time the fact was firmly established that it was not my father and mother who were responsible for me in not plunging into matrimonial bliss, (as it was presumed more so by anyone else but them) but it was the grasp of the reality, the truth, the scruples, and art that prevented me from being coerced into anything that my soul did not find relief in. Parents being parents, it was indeed difficult for them to comprehend that as their children we saw life far more clearly than them. 

Next, I asked myself whether I was threatened by commitment? Or whether I was caught between the devil and the deep sea, that to find a woman who would appreciate that I believed in the traditional role play of man the earner, and woman the homemaker, was something that was a bit too far fetched in the twenty first century? My inner voice provided me a negative for both, and I came to realise that when I found the right fit, and my heart and mind said yes, and the similar bells tolled in her heart and mind too, then it were to be a connection built to last.

A friend said that by not having a wife in my life I was missing out on life. Do I ‘really’ think that life would have been any different had there been a woman in my life? Possibly, but, until the one who mattered had put in an appearance, there was no reason to stress myself with what had not happened. “Are you always this pedantic?” she further asked. I didn’t know what to tell her, I mean we have no control over what we are doing this very instant, so how can we know what fate we would meet with in the future. As shrewd as we think we are, and plan for posterity, at least until we live, we should not fool ourselves into believing that the future can hold something glorious because it simply cannot. One must organise one’s life, but one must not go blindly with the flow, since it is only the dead fish that go with the flow. The ones that are alive make their own path.

I don’t think that men in general are frightened of commitment. The smartest of the lot have schooled themselves sufficient enough to safeguard themselves from rushing into things. They have become cautious for they do not have the tolerance to deal with the strain of expectations that loving a woman, in particular a wrong one, would demand of them, and thus, they prefer to be safe than sorry. Also, one must be warned that this notion of negotiating with caution merely because one has been hurt once seems nonsensical. Each situation is different, just as each person is different, so we ought to get rid of comparisons by attempting to emboss one experience over the other. Who knows, in the fuss of letting hurt overpower us, we might just about fail to recognise the one who is meant to be the one for us. Core of the matter is that one must be mindful, but not rigid. One must be sensitive, but not over sensitive. One must be cautious, but certainly not excessively cautious.

I was reading an article that states that the more intelligent the man, the more investigative he is, and the more investigative he is, the more complex he is to get along with. While the people who have arrived at such conclusions would have their points to prove, I find such blanket statements a bit juvenile to digest. I do concur that intelligence confines us from intermingling freely with the multitudes for lack of wavelength, but it is not entirely true that clever people are problematic. Possibly, they are difficult in case they find themselves adjoined in the arms of those who do not stem from their own sensibilities, but otherwise I think it is just their own farsightedness that comes to their rescue. Prudence allows a certain luxury of seeing beyond the obvious, and when those principles are employed with respect to our partners, then the true nature of each other’s interest in one another is revealed most plainly, which indirectly helps in navigating through a relationship with caution. As a result what wisdom does is trigger the conscience to retain an upper hand than mere superficiality, and that is where the notion of ‘intelligent men’ are not prone to being fooled in a relationship has taken birth, when it is nothing but experience and arithmetic at work.

Before I go, I would like to reiterate that it is not sexual confusion as I abovementioned, or the fear of commitment that keeps men from committing. It is just the methodical reasoning that they are gifted with which allows them to remain single until they find somebody of their own liking. They know that a wrong turn could cost them their peace, and this wrong turn seldom happens considering the points discussed above. So the smart ones are single by well-thought-out choice, and certainly not the victims of circumstance.



If Men Wrote Advice Columns



Q: My husband continually asks me to perform oral sex on him.
A: Do it. Semen can help you lose weight and gives a great glow to your skin. Interestingly, men know this. His offer to allow you to perform oral sex on him is totally selfless. This shows that he loves you. The best thing to do is to thank him by performing it twice a day, then cook him a nice meal.



Q: My husband doesn’t know where my clitoris is.
A: Your clit is of no concern to your husband. If you must mess with it, do it in your own time, or ask your best friend to help. You may wish to videotape yourself while doing this and present it to your hubby as a birthday gift. To ease your selfish guilt, perform oral sex on him and cook him a delicious meal.


Q: My husband has too many nights out with the boys.
A: This is perfectly natural behaviour and it should be encouraged. The man is a hunter and he needs to prove his prowess with other men. A night out chasing young single girls is a great stress relief and fosters in a more peaceful and relaxing home environment. Remember, nothing can rekindle your relationship better than the man being away for a day or two (its great time to clean the house too). Just look at how emotional and happy he is when he returns to his stable home. The best thing to do when he gets home is for you and your best friend to perform oral sex on him. Then cook him a nice meal.



Q: My husband wants a threesome with my best friend and me.
A: Obviously, your husband can’t get enough of you! Knowing that there is only one of you he can only settle for the next best thing - your best friend. Far from being an issue, this can bring you closer together. Why not get some of your old college roommates involved too? If you are still apprehensive, maybe you should let him be with your friends without you. If you still aren’t sure then just perform oral sex on him and cook him a nice meal while you think about it.




Q: My husband always has an orgasm then rolls over and goes to sleep without giving me one.
A: I’m not sure I understand the problem. Perhaps you’ve forgotten to cook him a nice meal....




Image: These images do not belong to me. I have sourced them from the Internet. I do not own it/them, or claim copyright to it/them. If it is your image please do let me know if you are fine with me adding your name to it. I shall add credits to it. This is not a site for business. The images have been used for representational purposes only. If you wish, I shall take it off in case of an objection do let me know and I shall take it off. Thank you.