Facebook Badge

Navigation Menu

featured Slider

Showing posts with label Stupid. Show all posts

THE EARNEST SCIENCE OF CLASSIC BOLLOCKS


 

At times, when vicissitudes turn out to be too orderly and my intellect finds itself clawing at the walls of routine like a drunk aristocrat locked out of his cozy Kensington manor, I amuse myself by walking with groups of middle-class women from Hounslow. Not companions, mind you—specimens. A travelling symposium on anxiety, gossip, cholesterol, and spiritual tourism.

 

We gather under rain trees admitting the air smells practically of petrol, jasmine, and disappointment. Then the performance begins.

 

“Oh, Meera,” one gasps, clutching her dupatta as though auditioning for sainthood, “he came home at eleven last night. Eleven! And then he asked for dinner.”

 

“Disgraceful, twat,” another mutters with the moral gravity of a Supreme Court judge sentencing a war criminal, “men these days have no sanskaar.”

 

Then comes the inevitable whisper:

 

“And Kavita’s husband… apparently there are rumours.”

 

Rumours. Christ. These dames circulate rumours with the efficiency of Swiss banking systems. They discuss temples, affairs, husbands, daughters-in-law, bowel movements, and God with precisely the same tone of exhausted catastrophe. Their mentalities swing endlessly between piety and prurience like a broken church bell in a storm.

 

And then—typically—they turn to me.

 

“But why do you work so hard?” one demands, sounding sincerely distressed. “You are not married. No offspring also.”

 

“No.”

 

“Then what is the need?”

 

The need.

 

There it is: the great middle-class philosophy of continuation. According to this clan, a dude may largely labour if he possesses a wife, three litters, a house loan, and chronic hypertension. Ambition sans domestic burden appears to them dubious, about pornographic. If you earn well without offspring, gentry ganders at you as withal you are hoarding gold bars in a bunker whilst laughing maniacally in silk pyjamas.

 

And this disease is not confined to the middle class. Oh, no. The rich simply wear better shoes while speaking the same guff.

 

Among my intimate circles—those palatial in bequeathed treasure and docile narcissism—the questions purely become more expensively phrased.

 

“Old boy,” someone utters over a ten-thousand-pound whisky, “you’re terribly committed to the gym lately. Who’s the lady?”

 

Another smirks. “Come now. No joe trains that consistently unless he’s trying to impress someone.”

 

Seemingly self-discipline is unattainable minus an erection attached to it.

 

Clearly a mister cannot deadlift saving some matron with excellent cheekbones has shattered his feelings first. The sheer wanker absurdity of it all is almost athletic in itself.

 

What saddens me is not merely the stupidity, but the confidence with which it is carried. These herds literally believe brio exists chiefly in approved formats. Matrimony. Broods. School admissions. Weekend brunches. Lipid medication. Death.

 

That is the script.

 

Anything outside it produces panic.

 

If a fella has no descendants, why does he require wealth? If a couple chooses not to procreate, why are they working so hard? Who comes into the money?

 

The entire ontology resembles a badly run relay race where wearied folks spend their lives passing batons to scions who at no time solicited to participate in the blooming event.

 

It is like quizzing a painter, “Why paint if no one buys the canvas?” Or besieging a pianist, “Why practise if Carnegie Hall never calls?” It reduces entity to utility. Everything must justify itself commercially, reproductively, socially.

 

Otherwise association becomes uncomfortable.

 

And community, let us be candid, is largely composed of petrified citizens desperately policing one another so they may avoid confronting the horrifying emptiness of their innermost esprit.

 

Most mortals do not think. They acquire thoughts in the manner like one acquires old furniture: dusty, ugly, impractical, but impossible to throw away inasmuch as grandmother would have wanted it.

 

Common sense, in myriad cases, has migrated completely out of the brain and settled somewhere near the ankles.

 

And nowhere is this idiocy more obvious than in the matter of infants.

 

Society talks of progeny not as anthropoidal beings, but as retirement schemes with birthdays.

 

“At least our successor will look after us.”

 

“There must be someone for old age.”

 

Presumably heirs are sentimentally spontaneous support Labradors with engineering degrees.

 

No one pronounces the placid part aloud: that innumerable plebeians have kiddies considering they are terrified of being lonely. Terrified of ageing. Terrified of confronting the fact that survival is intrinsically solitary.

 

So they create tiny creatures and silently hand them a debt they under no circumstances consented to paying.

 

Love becomes investment.

 

Parenthood becomes insurance.

 

Family becomes a pension policy with emotional blackmail indentured.

 

Absolute bellend bollocks.

 

A baby is not a sauntering life-protection document. Nor should one build an exclusive breath around the hope that someone else will eventually sit beside one’s hospital bed pretending not to check WhatsApp.

 

One must live for oneself.

 

Not selfishly. Not cruelly. But honestly.

 

And the same applies to the body.

 

The number of heads who assume my commitment to fitness ought to originate from romance is genuinely staggering.

 

“There must be a woman.”

 

Why?

 

Why the fuck must there always be a woman?

 

Can a man not humbly wish to preserve his own health? Must every disciplined act be fastened to seduction like some cheap cologne advertisement?

 

No, darling. I go to the health club owing to this protoplasm is the only permanent residence I possess, and unlike most landlords, biology is an unforgiving cunt when neglected.

 

If I fall ill tomorrow, a few may sympathise. They may send flowers. They may post tragic captions online. Sundry may even cry.

 

But none of them can suffer in my place.

 

Zip can bench-press your cancer for you.

 

Zero can cardio their way through your heart attack.

 

Zilch can squat your depression into submission as you sit there eating biscuits and romanticising self-destruction.

 

We are fundamentally alone in the maintenance of ourselves.

 

That is not pessimism.

 

That is sensibility stripped naked of decorative hogwash.

 

To remain fit, then, is not vanity. It is responsibility. It is basic self-respect. It is the acknowledgement that one owes oneself care before performing care theatrically for the approval of others.

 

But culture dislikes this idea enormously therefore civilisation depends upon collective delusion.

 

Idiots want you knackered. Espoused cause you “should be.” Parenting given “time is running out.” Extant according to templates written by deceased dimwits who themselves probably perished confused and constipated.

 

And the tragedy is that most seldom inquest any of it.

 

They circumnavigate from educational institution to marriage to rearing to funerals with the dull obedience of cattle strolling toward an abattoir howbeit deliberating interest rates.

 

Then they imply at someone living differently and become disconcerted.

 

Not because you are wrong.

 

But because your existence exposes the possibility that they on no account categorically chose theirs.

 

That is the real horror.

 

Not seclusion.

 

Not ageing.

 

Not even death.

 

But waking up one afternoon at sixty-three alongside someone equally bewildered and comprehending you have spent your whole specie performing a role in a play you barely blinkingly auditioned for.

 

And still—still—they persist.

 

These people mistake conformity for wisdom and repetition for meaning. They inherit fears from their parents, then lovingly hand them to their children like ancestral jewellery.

 

And when confronted with someone who refuses the script, they stare as peasants previously stared at astronomers: suspicious, irritated, faintly offended by the essence of alternative actualities.

 

I confess, beneath my irritation, there is pity.

 

Now that many of these imbeciles shall dwell and die beyond ever truly meeting themselves. They will know their spouse’s blood pressure, their neighbour’s scandal, their son’s exam scores, their daughter-in-law’s shortcomings, the opening hours of each shrine within a forty-mile radius—

 

—but not their private belfries.

 

Not their personal souls.

 

Not once.

 

And bloody hell, what a catastrophic waste of a human cycle that is.

 

 


IS THE TRUTH REALLY OUT THERE?


Yesterday, I had posted on Facebook – Fine let us believe for a moment that extra terrestrial life exists, but why in god’s name does everything land only in and around America. Strategy, eh?

That elicited a plethora of reactions. Some smiled, some laughed, and some more in-boxed me with their own reactions on it, and debated on things that I would find baseless to even mention here. But, yes, a friend wrote: “The same question always boggles me.” And quite without thinking I found myself typing away my response to him, which I am sharing below.

Bear in mind that I do have several American friends who are great human beings, and this is NOT directed at them, or the populace in general, only to the powers that be that create such stories to amuse themselves and fool the world.

“Perhaps it is a clever way to play on the emotions of people by keeping the drama and mystery alive. It is nearly impossible otherwise that only they, these enlightened Americans, are honoured with the sightings of UFO and their ilk. I also find it entertaining that these objects periodically keep hovering over their military, air borne and naval bases. Not that aliens possess the same inflated ego in knowing that America is as powerful a country that it assumes it is. 

Also, all of these carefully manufactured incidents indicate rather clearly how they are stage-managing information for the benefit of marketing and keeping alive something that does not exist to begin with. 

Extra-terrestrial life may possibly be around us, you or I may not be able to refute that, and it could be in a form not recognised by our naked eye, or our most able machinery. Furthermore, I find the aliens with elongated eyes and the human like resemblance a bit far fetched. Nearly the corniest prank pulled by them. How convenient to claim that they are a different form of a ‘human like being’ with legs and arms and eyes, but just a bit skewed here and there. For all we know, the alien life may not even have a body – what if they are entirely undetectable as I earlier speculatively mentioned. What if they are living parallely with us, and are far smarter to have outsmarted us? What if they are only a figment of our stream of consciousness? Or even imagination? Mind you, it is we human beings who are giving them a mind and body, simply because we have a mind and body.


Likewise, ‘the truth is out there’ is another stupid manifestation the media has woven around these matters. Yes, even the jesters would know that the truth is always out there until it dawns upon us that ‘it is’ the truth indeed, derived and arrived more out of experience than hearsay.”

Up In The Air - 2009


I happened to see the film last night and what a useless waste of time it was. It had nothing new to offer in terms of story, dialogues, visuals, talent or sensibility. I wonder why people made such a fuss about something this mediocre.

However, the title design is something that's worthy of a mention. It has been designed simple, yet smart and only for that has it earned a place on my blog.


PS: Watch it only if you want to spend 108 minutes of your precious time, you could otherwise use having a conversation with someone you would rather want to, and make real connections with, than the garbage shown about connections in this film.


PS - I LOVED the poster and the stills though :-) 


KAMA SUTRA



India, that vast and ancient land teeming with multitudes and steeped in the legacy of the Kama Sutra—a civilisation that once celebrated the human form with candour and artistry—now finds itself in a curious paradox. Its modern arbiters of morality, seated in the film censor’s chair, deem it necessary to obscure with blurred pixels those very parts of the body that nature, in all her honesty, has bestowed upon us, and to muzzle language that springs from the rougher edges of human passion. 

 

One is left to wonder: are these guardians of propriety genuinely blind to the irony, or do they assume that we are?